On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 09:49:36AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:45:41 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> > wrote: > > So don't call it like that. > > > > Also rip out a confusing comment and instead explain what's really > > going on. > > > > Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> > > --- > > +/* > > + * This is really ugly: Because old userspace abused the linux agp > > interface to > > + * manage the gtt, we need to claim that all intel devices are agp. For > > + * otherwise the drm core refuses to initialize the agp support code. > > */ > > So no new device entries, right? > > For the patch itself, > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
All three queued up for -next, thanks for testing and reviewing. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: dan...@ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
