On 05/10/2016 18:11, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 01:33:30PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>

Use types of more appropriate size in struct
intel_watermark_params to save 512 bytes of .rodata.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 10 +++++-----
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c  |  4 ++--
  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index c52b1d3a7ba0..59a73f8ca7af 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -799,11 +799,11 @@ struct intel_plane {
  };
struct intel_watermark_params {
-       unsigned long fifo_size;
-       unsigned long max_wm;
-       unsigned long default_wm;
-       unsigned long guard_size;
-       unsigned long cacheline_size;
+       u16 fifo_size;
+       u16 max_wm;
+       u8 default_wm;
+       u8 guard_size;
+       u8 cacheline_size;
  };
This thing has been bugging me since forever. And yet I never sent out a
fix. We could probably shrink things furher by tossing out a bunch of
the data since it's not all that diverse. But this looks like a decent
first step.

The other thing that bugs me about these is the defines for the actual
values. Makes it just that much harder to figure out what the actual
values are. I'm pretty sure I have a branch or two where I kill the
defines but naturally I can't find it right now. I'm too lazy to
double check the values now with this indirection in place, but your
choice of types does look reasonable, so

Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>

Thanks.

Btw we can shave one more kilobyte by similarly shrinking "struct video_levels" and "struct tv_mode". u8/u16 are enough to replace most of the ints there. If you want to ack that in principle I can include a patch for that in the next round.

Regards,

Tvrtko

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to