I also asked that same question many times. Maybe they can be unified later when we enable submission by default, but right now I believe this is the way to go, so
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.sriva...@intel.com> wrote: > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] >>Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 11:57 PM >>To: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.sriva...@intel.com> >>Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >>Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] i915/GuC: Make GuC loads default >> >>On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 04:20:04PM -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: >>> Proper functioning of HuC requires GuC to be loaded. Make GuC loads >>> default so that HuC works seemlessly. >>> Also, note that GuC submission is not made default and still needs to >>> be given as a kernel parameter. >>> Once the issues around GuC submission is resolved it is intended to >>> make it default as well. >> >><broken record>Why is this even a separate parameter?</> -Chris > > It is a separate parameter because HuC requires GuC to be loaded. It is ok if > command submission is not happening through GuC but GuC "has to" be loaded > for HuC to function. Guc_submission parameter enables the command submission > through GUC. But, guc_loading parameter ensures not only that the GuC is > loaded but also that HuC can now function. > > Anusha >>-- >>Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Rodrigo Vivi Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
