On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 10:41 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Em Qua, 2016-10-05 às 16:50 -0700, Anusha Srivatsa escreveu:
> > i915.enable_guc_loading/submission=2 forces the usage of GuC.
> > For platforms that do not have a GuC, asking the kernel to
> > use a GuC should not result in an error state. Do extra checks
> > to see if the platform even has a GuC or not, regardless of the
> > kernel parameter.
> 
> I'm not exactly sure who did what here, but I think Rodrigo deserves
> some credit for his initial work (and possibly debug). Maybe add:
> Based-on-patch-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>

I just drop a quickly patch that day, but she did the work, specially
debugging it after.

> 
> 
> > Cc: Zanoni Paulo <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
> 
> I see the Cc tag here but no Cc mail header with my email on it, so
> this email wasn't colored blue on my intel-gfx folder. Why didn't I
> actually get Cc'd here? Did you use git-send-email? This may be worth
> investigating since it may happen again in the future, and you want to
> make sure people you Cc actually get Cc'd.
> 
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.sriva...@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 15 +++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> > index 7ace96b..15d2d53 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> > @@ -717,13 +717,16 @@ void intel_guc_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> >     struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> >     struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw = &dev_priv->guc.guc_fw;
> >     const char *fw_path;
> > -
> 
> Please do not remove the blank line above.
> 
> > +   if (!HAS_GUC(dev)) {
> > +           i915.enable_guc_loading = 0;
> > +           i915.enable_guc_submission = 0;
> > +   } else {
> >     /* A negative value means "use platform default" */
> 
> Bad indentation here.
> 
> > -   if (i915.enable_guc_loading < 0)
> > -           i915.enable_guc_loading = HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev);
> > -   if (i915.enable_guc_submission < 0)
> > -           i915.enable_guc_submission = HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev);
> > -
> 
> Please also do not remove the blank line above.
> 
> Otherwise, looks good.
> 
> > +           if (i915.enable_guc_loading < 0)
> > +                   i915.enable_guc_loading =
> > HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev);
> > +           if (i915.enable_guc_submission < 0)
> > +                   i915.enable_guc_submission =
> > HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev);
> > +   }
> >     if (!HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev)) {
> >             fw_path = NULL;
> >     } else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev)) {

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to