On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:48:17PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > On ma, 2016-10-17 at 09:00 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Internally we allow for using more objects than a single process can > > allocate, i.e. we allow for a 64bit GPU address space even on a 32bit > > system. Using size_t may oveerflow. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > How might we get more than size_t passed in? I only notice a single > instance which uses obj.base->size which is size_t. > > So I'd not change the function parameters, only the sum. With that;
Our ABI is u64. The values we pass around are u64. Only we chose to use size_t for the object, go figure. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
