On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 19:14 -0700, Robert Bragg wrote:
> Consistent with the kernel.perf_event_paranoid sysctl option that can
> allow non-root users to access system wide cpu metrics, this can
> optionally allow non-root users to access system wide OA counter metrics
> from Gen graphics hardware.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Bragg <rob...@sixbynine.org>
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.a...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h  |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 50 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 01438fb..a138f86 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2171,6 +2171,7 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
>               bool initialized;
>  
>               struct kobject *metrics_kobj;
> +             struct ctl_table_header *sysctl_header;
>  
>               struct mutex lock;
>               struct list_head streams;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> index 8d07c41..4e42073 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,11 @@
>  #define POLL_FREQUENCY 200
>  #define POLL_PERIOD (NSEC_PER_SEC / POLL_FREQUENCY)
>  
> +/* for sysctl proc_dointvec_minmax of dev.i915.perf_stream_paranoid */
> +static int zero;
> +static int one = 1;
> +static u32 i915_perf_stream_paranoid = true;
> +
>  /* The maximum exponent the hardware accepts is 63 (essentially it selects 
> one
>   * of the 64bit timestamp bits to trigger reports from) but there's currently
>   * no known use case for sampling as infrequently as once per 47 thousand 
> years.
> @@ -1207,7 +1212,13 @@ i915_perf_open_ioctl_locked(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv,
>               }
>       }
>  
> -     if (!specific_ctx && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
> +     /* Similar to perf's kernel.perf_paranoid_cpu sysctl option
> +      * we check a dev.i915.perf_stream_paranoid sysctl option
> +      * to determine if it's ok to access system wide OA counters
> +      * without CAP_SYS_ADMIN privileges.
> +      */
> +     if (!specific_ctx &&
> +         i915_perf_stream_paranoid && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
>               DRM_ERROR("Insufficient privileges to open system-wide i915 
> perf stream\n");
>               ret = -EACCES;
>               goto err_ctx;
> @@ -1454,6 +1465,39 @@ void i915_perf_unregister(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv)
>       dev_priv->perf.metrics_kobj = NULL;
>  }
>  
> +static struct ctl_table oa_table[] = {
> +     {
> +      .procname = "perf_stream_paranoid",
> +      .data = &i915_perf_stream_paranoid,
> +      .maxlen = sizeof(i915_perf_stream_paranoid),
> +      .mode = 0644,
> +      .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax,
> +      .extra1 = &zero,
> +      .extra2 = &one,
> +      },
> +     {}
> +};
> +
> +static struct ctl_table i915_root[] = {
> +     {
> +      .procname = "i915",
> +      .maxlen = 0,
> +      .mode = 0555,
> +      .child = oa_table,
> +      },
> +     {}
> +};
> +
> +static struct ctl_table dev_root[] = {
> +     {
> +      .procname = "dev",
> +      .maxlen = 0,
> +      .mode = 0555,
> +      .child = i915_root,
> +      },
> +     {}
> +};
> +
>  void i915_perf_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>       if (!IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
> @@ -1484,6 +1528,8 @@ void i915_perf_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>       dev_priv->perf.oa.n_builtin_sets =
>               i915_oa_n_builtin_metric_sets_hsw;
>  
> +     dev_priv->perf.sysctl_header = register_sysctl_table(dev_root);
> +
>       dev_priv->perf.initialized = true;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1492,6 +1538,8 @@ void i915_perf_fini(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>       if (!dev_priv->perf.initialized)
>               return;
>  
> +     unregister_sysctl_table(dev_priv->perf.sysctl_header);
> +
>       memset(&dev_priv->perf.oa.ops, 0, sizeof(dev_priv->perf.oa.ops));
>       dev_priv->perf.initialized = false;
>  }

Looks fine.
Reviewed-by: Sourab Gupta <sourab.gu...@intel.com> 


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to