On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 08:54:53AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > If the LLC is coherent with the object, we do not need to worry about > whether main memory and cache mismatch when we hand the object back to > the system. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Makes sense to me. Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > index 4931bfcff2a2..3b021e9e3379 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > @@ -228,7 +228,8 @@ __i915_gem_object_release_shmem(struct > drm_i915_gem_object *obj, > if (obj->mm.madv == I915_MADV_DONTNEED) > obj->mm.dirty = false; > > - if ((obj->base.read_domains & I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU) == 0) > + if ((obj->base.read_domains & I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU) == 0 && > + !cpu_cache_is_coherent(obj->base.dev, obj->cache_level)) > drm_clflush_sg(pages); > > obj->base.read_domains = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU; > -- > 2.10.2 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
