Hey,
Op 02-12-16 om 14:07 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:47:55PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Op 28-11-16 om 18:37 schreef ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com: >>> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> >>> >>> Rather than accessing crtc->config in vlv_compute_wm_level() let's >>> pass in the crtc state explicitly. One step closer to atomic. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> >> Yay. All users of intel_crtc->config have to die in the future, but this is >> temporarily a legit use for it. > Pardon the stray reply earlier. What I wanted to say was that I was > playing around with coccinelle a bit the other night, and managed to > trick it into a little bit of crtc->config killing. I think I'll try > to expand my efforts there a bit more before posting the stuff though. > Don't worry about it, most of them have to be audited to make sure that the right crtc_state passed in is used. It shouldn't blindly be used to convert to crtc->state. I did some of the more tricky conversions in my nightly branch. https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~mlankhorst/linux/log/?h=nightly _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
