On Wed, 07 Dec 2016, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > A lot of the checks involving g33 are apparently quite ugly. Might be > nice to clean some of those up into a more readable form. But the > patch looks correct so, and it looks like the rest of the IS_G33 checks > already deal with PNV separately.
Agreed. But this is the required first step. > I do wonder a bit about the IS_PINEVIEW_G and IS_PINEVIEW_M. I wonder if > we should/could convert that to .is_mobile=true/false? Right now we seem > to set .is_mobile=true for both. Patches follow. In the mean time, this one pushed, thanks for the review. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
