On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 06:19:07PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> The i915_stolen_to_physical() function has 'unsigned long' as its
> return type but it returns the 'base' variable, which is of type
> 'u32'. The only place where this function is called assigns the
> returned value to dev_priv->mm.stolen_base, which is of type
> 'phys_addr_t'. The return value is actually a physical address and
> everything else in the stolen memory code seems to be using
> phys_addr_t, so fix i915_stolen_to_physical() to use phys_addr_t.

Size of phys_addr_t depends on PAE no? So what if someone were to boot
a !PAE kernel on a machine where stolen lives somewhere >4GiB?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c | 16 +++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
> index 127d698..0816ebd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
> @@ -79,12 +79,12 @@ void i915_gem_stolen_remove_node(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv,
>       mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->mm.stolen_lock);
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned long i915_stolen_to_physical(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv)
> +static phys_addr_t i915_stolen_to_physical(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>       struct pci_dev *pdev = dev_priv->drm.pdev;
>       struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = &dev_priv->ggtt;
>       struct resource *r;
> -     u32 base;
> +     phys_addr_t base;
>  
>       /* Almost universally we can find the Graphics Base of Stolen Memory
>        * at register BSM (0x5c) in the igfx configuration space. On a few
> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static unsigned long i915_stolen_to_physical(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>       if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <= 4 &&
>           !IS_G33(dev_priv) && !IS_PINEVIEW(dev_priv) && !IS_G4X(dev_priv)) {
>               struct {
> -                     u32 start, end;
> +                     phys_addr_t start, end;
>               } stolen[2] = {
>                       { .start = base, .end = base + ggtt->stolen_size, },
>                       { .start = base, .end = base + ggtt->stolen_size, },
> @@ -228,11 +228,12 @@ static unsigned long i915_stolen_to_physical(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  
>               if (stolen[0].start != stolen[1].start ||
>                   stolen[0].end != stolen[1].end) {
> +                     phys_addr_t end = base + ggtt->stolen_size - 1;
>                       DRM_DEBUG_KMS("GTT within stolen memory at 
> 0x%llx-0x%llx\n",
>                                     (unsigned long long)ggtt_start,
>                                     (unsigned long long)ggtt_end - 1);
> -                     DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Stolen memory adjusted to 0x%x-0x%x\n",
> -                                   base, base + (u32)ggtt->stolen_size - 1);
> +                     DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Stolen memory adjusted to %pa - %pa\n",
> +                                   &base, &end);
>               }
>       }
>  
> @@ -261,8 +262,9 @@ static unsigned long i915_stolen_to_physical(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>                * range. Apparently this works.
>                */
>               if (r == NULL && !IS_GEN3(dev_priv)) {
> -                     DRM_ERROR("conflict detected with stolen region: 
> [0x%08x - 0x%08x]\n",
> -                               base, base + (uint32_t)ggtt->stolen_size);
> +                     phys_addr_t end = base + ggtt->stolen_size;
> +                     DRM_ERROR("conflict detected with stolen region: [%pa - 
> %pa]\n",
> +                               &base, &end);
>                       base = 0;
>               }
>       }
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to