On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 01:10:57PM +0000, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On 2 February 2017 at 09:08, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > + err = -EINVAL;
> > + mutex_lock(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
> > + err = i915_gem_object_attach_phys(obj, PAGE_SIZE);
> > + mutex_unlock(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
> > + if (err) {
> > + pr_err("i915_gem_object_attach_phys failed, err=%d\n", err);
> > + goto out_obj;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (obj->ops != &i915_gem_phys_ops) {
> > + pr_err("i915_gem_object_attach_phys did not create a phys
> > object\n");
> > + goto out_obj;
> I'm guessing that you meant to return an error value, see below also.
Looks like I still thought I had the err = -EINVAL set. Good thing the
purpose of the test was to trigger the oops!
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
