On 02/10/2017 04:04 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 02:24:25AM -0800, Oscar Mateo wrote:
There is other stuff that potentially needs cleaning, even if we didn't get to
the point of
creating an execbuf_client.
Just because the allocator doesn't employ onion unwinding?
Or is there more to come?
No, nothing more to come. I just saw this was wrong in passing and
decided to send a patch. But I see Joonas is spearheading a bigger
cleanup, so maybe this can be fixed there.
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.ma...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.oc.uk>
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
