On 21/02/2017 09:41, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 09:13:47AM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
@@ -468,6 +469,7 @@ execute_notify(struct i915_sw_fence *fence, enum 
i915_sw_fence_notify state)

        switch (state) {
        case FENCE_COMPLETE:
+               trace_i915_gem_request_execute(request);
                break;

Move to __i915_gem_request_submit(). (One less complication for me).

Ack.

I guess you are thinking of changing its name to
__i915_gem_request_execute().

No, why? The idea is i915_gem_request_submit -> "ready for execution / dependencies resolved" and i915_gem_request_execute -> "about to be submitted to execution backend".

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to