On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:30:38PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 22 Feb 2017, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:06:35PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > >> > Handling the dynamic charp module parameter requires us to copy it for > >> > the error state, or remember to lock it when reading (in case it used > >> > with 0600). > >> > > >> > v2: Use __always_inline and __builtin_strcmp > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > >> > Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com> > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com> > > > > Joonas, do we feel justified in pushing now that Jani has a pending > > usecase? > > And how about those firmware blob overrides, you had a patch for that > didn't you?
They need more polish to do what the commit log claims, i.e. make them useful for bisection and atm everyone is digging through the [gh]uc init and loaders. It's a bit busy there atm. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
