On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 02:16:49PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 22/02/2017 11:46, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >Combine the common code for the pair of waiters into a single function.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> >---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> >b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> >index 42250eaf56ec..66d292384e60 100644
> >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> >@@ -1024,6 +1024,16 @@ bool __i915_spin_request(const struct
> >drm_i915_gem_request *req,
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> >+static bool __i915_reset_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
> >+{
> >+ if (likely(!i915_reset_in_progress(&request->i915->gpu_error)))
> >+ return false;
> >+
> >+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> >+ i915_reset(request->i915);
> >+ return true;
> >+}
> Okay in principle just unclear from the code now what it does. I
> suggest __i915_check_and_reset_request or
> __i915_request_check_and_reset so it is obvious the statement not
> only checks but also does stuff.
__i915_wait_request_check_and_reset ?
Looking at it keeping the i915_wait_request in there to show it's a
dedicated helper will also be sensible.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
