From: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>

For v3+ VBTs we should call MIPI_SEQ_TEAR_OFF before MIPI_SEQ_DISPLAY_OFF,
v2 VBTs do not have MIPI_SEQ_TEAR_OFF so there this is a nop.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Paauwe <bob.j.paa...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
index 5a50645c3a37..7dbef67a5fa0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
@@ -921,6 +921,8 @@ static void intel_dsi_post_disable(struct intel_encoder 
*encoder,
         * if disable packets are sent before sending shutdown packet then in
         * some next enable sequence send turn on packet error is observed
         */
+       if (is_cmd_mode(intel_dsi))
+               intel_dsi_exec_vbt_sequence(intel_dsi, MIPI_SEQ_TEAR_OFF);
        intel_dsi_exec_vbt_sequence(intel_dsi, MIPI_SEQ_DISPLAY_OFF);
 
        /* Transition to LP-00 */
-- 
2.1.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to