On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 03:12:46PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> I didn't spot anything that would require ordering here (well not
> anywhere else either), and I'm trying to unify at least modern drivers
> on one close hook.
>
> Cc: Rob Clark <robdcl...@gmail.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: freedr...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com>
I think I've convinced myself that this is functionally equivalent (or at least
if Bad Things could happen with postclose, they would also be Bad Things with
preclose). So, fwiw:
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanp...@chromium.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> index 604331f3cf39..44774f02ef0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ static int msm_open(struct drm_device *dev, struct
> drm_file *file)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void msm_preclose(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file)
> +static void msm_postclose(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file)
> {
> struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev->dev_private;
> struct msm_file_private *ctx = file->driver_priv;
> @@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ static struct drm_driver msm_driver = {
> DRIVER_ATOMIC |
> DRIVER_MODESET,
> .open = msm_open,
> - .preclose = msm_preclose,
> + .postclose = msm_postclose,
> .lastclose = msm_lastclose,
> .irq_handler = msm_irq,
> .irq_preinstall = msm_irq_preinstall,
> --
> 2.11.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
