From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>

Starting from commit b63a16f6cd89 ("drm/i915: Compute display surface
offset in the plane check hook for SKL+") we've already rotated the src
coordinates by 270 degrees by the time we check if a scaler is needed
or not, so we must not account for the rotation a second time.
Previously we did these steps in the opposite order and hence the
scaler check had to deal with rotation itself. The double rotation
handling causes us to enable a scaler pretty much every time 90/270
degree plane rotation is requested, leading to fuzzier fonts and whatnot.

v2: s/unsigned/unsigned int/ to appease checkpatch

Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Tested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Fixes: b63a16f6cd89 ("drm/i915: Compute display surface offset in the plane 
check hook for SKL+")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 14 ++++++++------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 81baa5a9780c..09c9995cafe6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -4609,7 +4609,7 @@ static void cpt_verify_modeset(struct drm_device *dev, 
int pipe)
 
 static int
 skl_update_scaler(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, bool force_detach,
-                 unsigned scaler_user, int *scaler_id, unsigned int rotation,
+                 unsigned int scaler_user, int *scaler_id,
                  int src_w, int src_h, int dst_w, int dst_h)
 {
        struct intel_crtc_scaler_state *scaler_state =
@@ -4618,9 +4618,12 @@ skl_update_scaler(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, 
bool force_detach,
                to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
        int need_scaling;
 
-       need_scaling = drm_rotation_90_or_270(rotation) ?
-               (src_h != dst_w || src_w != dst_h):
-               (src_w != dst_w || src_h != dst_h);
+       /*
+        * Src coordinates are already rotated by 270 degrees for
+        * the 90/270 degree plane rotation cases (to match the
+        * GTT mapping), hence no need to account for rotation here.
+        */
+       need_scaling = src_w != dst_w || src_h != dst_h;
 
        /*
         * if plane is being disabled or scaler is no more required or force 
detach
@@ -4682,7 +4685,7 @@ int skl_update_scaler_crtc(struct intel_crtc_state *state)
        const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = 
&state->base.adjusted_mode;
 
        return skl_update_scaler(state, !state->base.active, SKL_CRTC_INDEX,
-               &state->scaler_state.scaler_id, DRM_ROTATE_0,
+               &state->scaler_state.scaler_id,
                state->pipe_src_w, state->pipe_src_h,
                adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay, adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay);
 }
@@ -4711,7 +4714,6 @@ static int skl_update_scaler_plane(struct 
intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
        ret = skl_update_scaler(crtc_state, force_detach,
                                drm_plane_index(&intel_plane->base),
                                &plane_state->scaler_id,
-                               plane_state->base.rotation,
                                drm_rect_width(&plane_state->base.src) >> 16,
                                drm_rect_height(&plane_state->base.src) >> 16,
                                drm_rect_width(&plane_state->base.dst),
-- 
2.10.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to