From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
Gen 10 should use the exact same code as Gen 9, so change the check to
take this into consideration, and also assume that future platforms
will run this code.
Also add a MISSING_CASE(), just in case we do something wrong, instead
of silently failing.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 4c07b91..a2b2509 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2291,7 +2291,7 @@ static void ilk_compute_wm_level(const struct
drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
uint16_t wm[8])
{
- if (IS_GEN9(dev_priv)) {
+ if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9) {
uint32_t val;
int ret, i;
int level, max_level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev_priv);
@@ -2351,7 +2351,7 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv,
}
/*
- * WaWmMemoryReadLatency:skl,glk
+ * WaWmMemoryReadLatency:skl+,glk
*
* punit doesn't take into account the read latency so we need
* to add 2us to the various latency levels we retrieve from the
@@ -2390,6 +2390,8 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv,
wm[0] = 7;
wm[1] = (mltr >> MLTR_WM1_SHIFT) & ILK_SRLT_MASK;
wm[2] = (mltr >> MLTR_WM2_SHIFT) & ILK_SRLT_MASK;
+ } else {
+ MISSING_CASE(INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv));
}
}
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
