Regards
Shashank
On 4/24/2017 4:17 PM, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote:
Display workaround #1139 for Geminilake instructs us to restrict HDMI
to 8 bpc when htotal is greater than 5460. Otherwise, the pipe is unable
to generate a proper signal and is left in a state where corruption is
seen with other modes.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100440
Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sha...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
<ander.conselvan.de.olive...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
index 6efc3cb..52f0b2d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
@@ -1327,6 +1327,11 @@ static bool hdmi_12bpc_possible(struct intel_crtc_state
*crtc_state)
return false;
}
+ /* Display Wa #1139 */
+ if (IS_GLK_REVID(dev_priv, 0, GLK_REVID_A1) &&
+ crtc_state->base.adjusted_mode.htotal > 5460)
Small inputs:
- We might wanna extend this for CNL too, as the WAR is valid for it
too. I am not sure it should be this same patch or not.
- We need to modify this check not to affect the YCBCR 420 modes, as
there won't be any change between the timings of a YCBCR mode and a
normal mode (apart from a flag), but htotal should be valid in YCBCR
420 case. But I can handle this part while sending second patch set of
YCBCR 420 handling.
- Also, should we reject 12BPC totally, or just clamp htotal to max
possible (5460) and go ahead? Ville ?
In any case, please feel free to use:
Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sha...@intel.com>
+ return false;
+
return true;
}
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
