As the handler is now quite complex, involving a few atomics, the cost
of the function preamble is negligible in comparison and so we should
leave the function out-of-line for better I$.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 927b408e6e95..a58152dd7021 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -1317,7 +1317,7 @@ static void snb_gt_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv,
ivybridge_parity_error_irq_handler(dev_priv, gt_iir);
}
-static __always_inline void
+static void
gen8_cs_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 iir, int test_shift)
{
bool tasklet = false;
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
