On 06/21/2017 10:28 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Almost right but still racy, it's called before the interrupts are
> uninstalled. So let's just drop it.
> 
> Cc: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c
> index d1b9c34c7c00..1853557fef46 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c
> @@ -256,7 +256,6 @@ static void mxsfb_unload(struct drm_device *drm)
>  
>       drm_kms_helper_poll_fini(drm);
>       drm_mode_config_cleanup(drm);
> -     drm_vblank_cleanup(drm);
>  
>       pm_runtime_get_sync(drm->dev);
>       drm_irq_uninstall(drm);
> 


-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to