Hi
2012/7/3 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> index f33fe1a..b71303c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -752,3 +747,18 @@ void intel_ddi_dpms(struct drm_encoder *encoder, int
> mode)
> I915_WRITE(DDI_BUF_CTL(port),
> temp);
> }
> +
> +void intel_disable_ddi(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + struct intel_hdmi *intel_hdmi = enc_to_intel_hdmi(&encoder->base);
> + int port = intel_hdmi->ddi_port;
> + u32 temp;
> +
> + temp = I915_READ(DDI_BUF_CTL(port));
> + temp &= ~DDI_BUF_CTL_ENABLE;
> +
> + I915_WRITE(DDI_BUF_CTL(port),
> + temp);
<bikeshed>
Since you're creating 2 "new functions" you might want to move temp to
the upper line in both intel_disable_did and intel_enable_ddi.
Every time I look at this I think about fixing it. And now there are
two. Maybe it's just my obsessive compulsive disorder... :)
</bikeshed>
--
Paulo Zanoni
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
