On 28/06/17 11:37, Michel Thierry wrote:
Platforms with per-engine reset enabled (i915.reset=2) are unlikely to
perform a full chip reset, keeping the reset_count unmodified. In order
to keep the expectations of this test, enforce that full GPU reset is
enabled (i915.reset=1).
Later on, we can expand the reset_stats ioctl to also return the number
of per-engine resets and use reset_count + reset_engine_count when
checking for the updated reset count.
v2: Rebase, don't use gem_gpu_reset_type directly, since we now have
additional helpers.
Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hi...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thie...@intel.com>
---
tests/gem_reset_stats.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/gem_reset_stats.c b/tests/gem_reset_stats.c
index 73afeeb2..9ac08aab 100644
--- a/tests/gem_reset_stats.c
+++ b/tests/gem_reset_stats.c
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include "igt.h"
+#include "igt_sysfs.h"
+#include <limits.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
@@ -777,15 +779,24 @@ igt_main
int fd;
bool has_reset_stats;
+ bool using_full_reset;
fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
devid = intel_get_drm_devid(fd);
has_reset_stats = gem_has_reset_stats(fd);
+ igt_assert(igt_sysfs_set_parameter
+ (fd, "reset", "%d", 1 /* only global reset */));
+
+ using_full_reset = !gem_engine_reset_enabled(fd) &&
+ gem_gpu_reset_enabled(fd);
+
close(fd);
igt_require_f(has_reset_stats,
"No reset stats ioctl support. Too old
kernel?\n");
+ igt_require_f(using_full_reset,
+ "Full GPU reset is not enabled. Is enable_hangcheck
set?\n");
}
igt_subtest("params")
@@ -831,4 +842,13 @@ igt_main
igt_subtest_f("defer-hangcheck-%s", e->name)
RUN_TEST(defer_hangcheck(e));
}
+
+ igt_fixture {
+ int fd;
+
+ fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
+ igt_assert(igt_sysfs_set_parameter
+ (fd, "reset", "%d", INT_MAX /* any reset method */));
I would still suggest that we restore the reset value we had at the
beginning of the test. I think that since we disabled single engine,
this would actually set the parameter to an unsafe value.
Thanks,
Antonio
+ close(fd);
+ }
}
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
