Regards
Shashank
On 7/12/2017 10:47 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 04:48:41PM +0530, Shashank Sharma wrote:
To support ycbcr output, we need a pipe CSC block to do
RGB->YCBCR conversion.
Current Intel platforms have only one pipe CSC unit, so
we can either do color correction using it, or we can perform
RGB->YCBCR conversion.
This function adds a csc handler, which uses recommended bspec
values to perform RGB->YCBCR conversion (target color space BT709)
V2: Rebase
V3: Rebase
V4: Rebase
V5: Addressed review comments from Ander
- Remove extra line added in the patch
- Add the spec details in the commit message
- Combine two if(cond) while calling intel_crtc_compute_config
V6: Handle YCBCR420 outputs only (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sha...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 17 +++++++++++++
2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
index 306c6b0..8a5d211 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
@@ -41,6 +41,19 @@
#define LEGACY_LUT_LENGTH (sizeof(struct drm_color_lut) * 256)
+/* Post offset values for RGB->YCBCR conversion */
+#define POSTOFF_RGB_TO_YUV_HI 0x800
+#define POSTOFF_RGB_TO_YUV_ME 0x100
+#define POSTOFF_RGB_TO_YUV_LO 0x800
+
+/* Direct spec values for RGB->YUV conversion matrix */
Are these BT.601 or BT.709 or something else?
I thought I added some comment mentioning this being BT 709, but looks
like dealing with too many paptches :)
Will add those details.
+#define CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_RU_GU 0x2ba809d8
+#define CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_BU 0x37e80000
+#define CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_RY_GY 0x1e089cc0
+#define CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_BY 0xb5280000
+#define CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_RV_GV 0xbce89ad8
+#define CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_BV 0x1e080000
IIRC Ander didn't like these, and neither do I. I'd much prefer to reuse
the code we alreayd have for dealing with the CSC. Except I think that's
pretty broken in places so I guess we can go with this for now and try
to clean up the color management stuff later.
Yes, that was the plan. I was planning to fix the complete CSC cleanup
stuff in a separate patch, but as that needs much
of validation before we can merge it, I added in a bottom half. I will
send a patch for the same soon.
+
/*
* Extract the CSC coefficient from a CTM coefficient (in U32.32 fixed point
* format). This macro takes the coefficient we want transformed and the
@@ -91,6 +104,35 @@ static void ctm_mult_by_limited(uint64_t *result, int64_t
*input)
}
}
+void i9xx_load_ycbcr_conversion_matrix(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc)
+{
+ int pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_crtc->base.dev);
+
+ /* We don't use high values for conversion */
I don't understand what this comment is trying so say.
Yeah, it should have been "we dont use pre-offsets for conversion"
+ I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_PREOFF_HI(pipe), 0);
+ I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_PREOFF_ME(pipe), 0);
+ I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_PREOFF_LO(pipe), 0);
+
+ /* Program direct spec values for RGB to YCBCR conversion matrix */
+ I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_COEFF_RU_GU(pipe), CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_RU_GU);
+ I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_COEFF_BU(pipe), CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_BU);
+
+ I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_COEFF_RY_GY(pipe), CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_RY_GY);
+ I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_COEFF_BY(pipe), CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_BY);
+
+ I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_COEFF_RV_GV(pipe), CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_RV_GV);
+ I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_COEFF_BV(pipe), CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_BV);
+
+ /* Spec postoffset values */
+ I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_POSTOFF_HI(pipe), POSTOFF_RGB_TO_YUV_HI);
+ I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_POSTOFF_ME(pipe), POSTOFF_RGB_TO_YUV_ME);
+ I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_POSTOFF_LO(pipe), POSTOFF_RGB_TO_YUV_LO);
+
+ /* CSC mode before gamma */
+ I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_MODE(pipe), 0);
+}
+
/* Set up the pipe CSC unit. */
static void i9xx_load_csc_matrix(struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
@@ -101,7 +143,10 @@ static void i9xx_load_csc_matrix(struct drm_crtc_state
*crtc_state)
uint16_t coeffs[9] = { 0, };
struct intel_crtc_state *intel_crtc_state =
to_intel_crtc_state(crtc_state);
- if (crtc_state->ctm) {
+ if (intel_crtc_state->ycbcr420) {
+ i9xx_load_ycbcr_conversion_matrix(intel_crtc);
+ return;
+ } else if (crtc_state->ctm) {
struct drm_color_ctm *ctm =
(struct drm_color_ctm *)crtc_state->ctm->data;
uint64_t input[9] = { 0, };
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index b4a6415..c5ff568 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -6288,6 +6288,23 @@ static int intel_crtc_compute_config(struct intel_crtc
*crtc,
return -EINVAL;
}
+ /* YCBCR420 feasibility check */
+ if (pipe_config->ycbcr420) {
+ struct drm_crtc_state *drm_state = &pipe_config->base;
+
+ /*
+ * There is only one pipe CSC unit per pipe, and we need that
+ * for output conversion from RGB->YCBCR. So if CTM is already
+ * applied we can't support YCBCR420 output.
+ */
+ if (drm_state->ctm) {
+ DRM_ERROR("YCBCR420 and CTM is not possible\n");
DRM_DEBUG_KMS
We are failing an atomic_check(), shouldn't this be highlighted ?
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("YCBCR420 output is possible from CRTC\n");
Seems like a fairly pointless debug print.
Yeah, ok.
- Shashank
+ }
+
/*
* Pipe horizontal size must be even in:
* - DVO ganged mode
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
