Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> The engine provides a mirror of the CSB in the HWSP. If we use the
> cacheable reads from the HWSP, we can shave off a few mmio reads per
> context-switch interrupt (which are quite frequent!). Just removing a
> couple of mmio is not enough to actually reduce any latency, but a small
> reduction in overall cpu usage.
>
> Much appreciation for Ben dropping the bombshell that the CSB was in the
> HWSP and for Michel in digging out the details.
>
> v2: Don't be lazy, add the defines for the indices.
> v3: Include the HWSP in debugfs/i915_engine_info
> v4: Check for GVT-g, it currently depends on intercepting CSB mmio
> v5: Fixup GVT-g mmio path
>
> Suggested-by: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widaw...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thie...@intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@intel.com>
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospu...@intel.com>
> Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhen...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Zhi Wang <zhi.a.w...@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thie...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c     |  7 +++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c        | 16 +++++++++++-----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 620c9218d1c1..5fd01c14a3ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -3384,6 +3384,7 @@ static int i915_engine_info(struct seq_file *m, void 
> *unused)
>                          upper_32_bits(addr), lower_32_bits(addr));
>  
>               if (i915.enable_execlists) {
> +                     const u32 *hws = 
> &engine->status_page.page_addr[I915_HWS_CSB_BUF0_INDEX];
>                       u32 ptr, read, write;
>                       unsigned int idx;
>  
> @@ -3404,10 +3405,12 @@ static int i915_engine_info(struct seq_file *m, void 
> *unused)
>                               write += GEN8_CSB_ENTRIES;
>                       while (read < write) {
>                               idx = ++read % GEN8_CSB_ENTRIES;
> -                             seq_printf(m, "\tExeclist CSB[%d]: 0x%08x, 
> context: %d\n",
> +                             seq_printf(m, "\tExeclist CSB[%d]: 0x%08x 
> [0x%08x in hwsp], context: %d [%d in hwsp]\n",
>                                          idx,
>                                          
> I915_READ(RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_BUF_LO(engine, idx)),
> -                                        
> I915_READ(RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_BUF_HI(engine, idx)));
> +                                        hws[idx * 2],
> +                                        
> I915_READ(RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_BUF_HI(engine, idx)),
> +                                        hws[idx * 2 + 1]);
>                       }
>  
>                       rcu_read_lock();
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index 3469badedbe0..41dc04eb6097 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -547,10 +547,17 @@ static void intel_lrc_irq_handler(unsigned long data)
>       while (test_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_EXECLIST, &engine->irq_posted)) {
>               u32 __iomem *csb_mmio =
>                       dev_priv->regs + 
> i915_mmio_reg_offset(RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_PTR(engine));
> -             u32 __iomem *buf =
> -                     dev_priv->regs + 
> i915_mmio_reg_offset(RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_BUF_LO(engine, 0));
> +             /* The HWSP contains a (cacheable) mirror of the CSB */
> +             const u32 *buf =
> +                     &engine->status_page.page_addr[I915_HWS_CSB_BUF0_INDEX];

Could be also const u32 * const buf = ...
as in debugfs counterpart. Value added is quite thin tho vs clutter so
not insisting.

>               unsigned int head, tail;
>  
> +             /* However GVT emulation depends upon intercepting CSB mmio */
> +             if (unlikely(intel_vgpu_active(dev_priv))) {
> +                     buf = (u32 * __force)
> +                             (dev_priv->regs + 
> i915_mmio_reg_offset(RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_BUF_LO(engine, 0)));
> +             }
> +
>               /* The write will be ordered by the uncached read (itself
>                * a memory barrier), so we do not need another in the form
>                * of a locked instruction. The race between the interrupt
> @@ -590,13 +597,12 @@ static void intel_lrc_irq_handler(unsigned long data)
>                        * status notifier.
>                        */
>  
> -                     status = readl(buf + 2 * head);
> +                     status = buf[2 * head];
>                       if (!(status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_COMPLETED_MASK))
>                               continue;
>  
>                       /* Check the context/desc id for this event matches */
> -                     GEM_DEBUG_BUG_ON(readl(buf + 2 * head + 1) !=
> -                                      port->context_id);
> +                     GEM_DEBUG_BUG_ON(buf[2 * head + 1] != port->context_id);

In here I wonder if GEM_BUG_ON check with the equivalence of the hswp value
vs mmio valu would serve any purpose. Adding the mmio delay here tho
would be harmful.

Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@intel.com>


>  
>                       rq = port_unpack(port, &count);
>                       GEM_BUG_ON(count == 0);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> index d33c93444c0d..2c55cfa14fb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> @@ -496,6 +496,8 @@ intel_write_status_page(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, 
> int reg, u32 value)
>  #define I915_GEM_HWS_SCRATCH_INDEX   0x40
>  #define I915_GEM_HWS_SCRATCH_ADDR (I915_GEM_HWS_SCRATCH_INDEX << 
> MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX_SHIFT)
>  
> +#define I915_HWS_CSB_BUF0_INDEX              0x10
> +
>  struct intel_ring *
>  intel_engine_create_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int size);
>  int intel_ring_pin(struct intel_ring *ring,
> -- 
> 2.13.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to