On Mon, 07 Aug 2017, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@gmail.com> wrote: > good idea. > > > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 01:38:36PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> >>> + * >>> + * For bit fields, define a _MASK and a _SHIFT macro. Define bit field >>> contents >>> + * so that they are already shifted in place, and can be directly OR'd. For >>> + * convenience, function-like macros may be used to define bit fields, but >>> do >>> + * note that the macros may be needed to read as well as write the register >>> + * contents. > > I'd mention define as needed if needed... > to avoid people adding many definition for shifts and masks that will > never get used...
With mask and shift defined you don't need to always look at the spec. > also maybe to add that between name and content the real tabs are required > as much tab as needed to make sure that all bits defines on that bit > is vertically aligned. Added. > Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com> Thanks. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
