Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2017-08-10 15:50:43) > I'm not sure if this is really the case and I don't believe > this is the real fix for the bug mentioned here, but since > I don't see a reliable path when mst_port is set and when > mode_valid is requested I believe it is worth to have this > protection here.
The guard looks correct. We defend ourselves against the async disconnect elsewhere through the post-detect callbacks, i.e. we cannot rely on intel_connector->mst_port remaining valid for a whole detect() cycle. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
