>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
>Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 8:18 AM
>To: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.sriva...@intel.com>; intel-
>g...@lists.freedesktop.org
>Cc: Wajdeczko, Michal <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>; Sundaresan, Sujaritha
><sujaritha.sundare...@intel.com>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Add GuC Load time to debugfs
>
>Cc: Sujaritha
>
Thanks Oscar for adding Sujaritha.
Do you think the approach here is accurate?

Anusha

>On 08/24/2017 09:38 PM, Anusha Srivatsa wrote:
>> Calculate the time that GuC takes to load.
>> This information could be very useful in determining if GuC is taking
>> unreasonably long time to load in a certain platforms.
>>
>> Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.ma...@intel.com>
>> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.sriva...@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c     | 4 ++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 4 ++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h         | 3 +++
>>   3 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
>> index 48572b157222..9283fc714705 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
>> @@ -2379,6 +2379,10 @@ static int i915_guc_load_status_info(struct seq_file
>*m, void *data)
>>              guc_fw->major_ver_wanted, guc_fw->minor_ver_wanted);
>>      seq_printf(m, "\tversion found: %d.%d\n",
>>              guc_fw->major_ver_found, guc_fw->minor_ver_found);
>> +    seq_printf(m, "\tLoad time is %lu ms\n",
>> +               jiffies_to_msecs(dev_priv->guc.guc_finish_load -
>> +               dev_priv->guc.guc_start_load));
>> +
>>      seq_printf(m, "\theader: offset is %d; size = %d\n",
>>              guc_fw->header_offset, guc_fw->header_size);
>>      seq_printf(m, "\tuCode: offset is %d; size = %d\n", diff --git
>> a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
>> index 8b0ae7fce7f2..1c5059b930f9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
>> @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static inline bool guc_ucode_response(struct
>drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>   static int guc_ucode_xfer_dma(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>                            struct i915_vma *vma)
>>   {
>> +    struct intel_guc *guc = &dev_priv->guc;
>>      struct intel_uc_fw *guc_fw = &dev_priv->guc.fw;
>>      unsigned long offset;
>>      struct sg_table *sg = vma->pages;
>> @@ -226,6 +227,7 @@ static int guc_ucode_xfer_dma(struct
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>
>>      /* Finally start the DMA */
>>      I915_WRITE(DMA_CTRL, _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(UOS_MOVE |
>START_DMA));
>> +    guc->guc_start_load = jiffies;
>>
>>      /*
>>       * Wait for the DMA to complete & the GuC to start up.
>> @@ -240,6 +242,8 @@ static int guc_ucode_xfer_dma(struct drm_i915_private
>*dev_priv,
>>      DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("DMA status 0x%x, GuC status 0x%x\n",
>>                      I915_READ(DMA_CTRL), status);
>>
>> +    guc->guc_finish_load = jiffies;
>> +
>>      if ((status & GS_BOOTROM_MASK) == GS_BOOTROM_RSA_FAILED) {
>>              DRM_ERROR("GuC firmware signature verification failed\n");
>>              ret = -ENOEXEC;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h index 22ae52b17b0f..3d5a15ed1995
>> 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
>> @@ -210,6 +210,9 @@ struct intel_guc {
>>
>>      /* GuC's FW specific notify function */
>>      void (*notify)(struct intel_guc *guc);
>> +
>> +    unsigned long guc_start_load;
>> +    unsigned long guc_finish_load;
>>   };
>>
>>   struct intel_huc {

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to