I see. Thanks for the explanation! :) -----Original Message----- From: Joonas Lahtinen [mailto:joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 5:20 PM To: Wang, Zhi A <zhi.a.w...@intel.com>; Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.v...@intel.com> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; zhen...@linux.intel.com; intel-gvt-...@lists.freedesktop.org; ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk; Widawsky, Benjamin <benjamin.widaw...@intel.com> Subject: Re: [RFCv6 2/2] drm/i915: Introduce private PAT management
On Thu, 2017-08-31 at 08:28 +0000, Wang, Zhi A wrote: > Do you mean I still keep I915_WRITE(xxxxx) in xxxx_setup_private_pat() like > before? Then changed them in a new patch? No, I mean use the new code structure, but make sure all register writes are equal to what they were before (and please send a separate patch for the CNL caching issue before that). Regards, Joonas -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
