If we wedged one engine with unready requests to a second engine
(blocked by waiting on requests from the first, using a dma-fence),
check that we propagate the -EIO to those in-flight requests.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 tests/gem_eio.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/gem_eio.c b/tests/gem_eio.c
index 249510e7..4e3b64b3 100644
--- a/tests/gem_eio.c
+++ b/tests/gem_eio.c
@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
  *
  */
 
-#include "igt.h"
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <string.h>
@@ -39,6 +38,8 @@
 
 #include <drm.h>
 
+#include "igt.h"
+#include "igt_sysfs.h"
 #include "sw_sync.h"
 
 IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test that specific ioctls report a wedged GPU (EIO).");
@@ -203,14 +204,95 @@ static void test_inflight_external(int fd)
        close(timeline);
 }
 
+static void test_inflight_internal(int fd)
+{
+       struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf;
+       struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj[2];
+       uint32_t bbe = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
+       igt_hang_t hang;
+       int fence;
+
+       igt_require(gem_has_exec_fence(fd));
+
+       gem_require_ring(fd, I915_EXEC_BLT);
+
+       igt_require(i915_reset_control(false));
+       hang = igt_hang_ring(fd, I915_EXEC_RENDER);
+
+       memset(obj, 0, sizeof(obj));
+       obj[0].handle = hang.handle;
+       obj[0].flags = EXEC_OBJECT_WRITE;
+       obj[1].handle = gem_create(fd, 4096);
+       gem_write(fd, obj[1].handle, 0, &bbe, sizeof(bbe));
+
+       memset(&execbuf, 0, sizeof(execbuf));
+       execbuf.buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(obj);
+       execbuf.buffer_count = 2;
+       execbuf.flags = I915_EXEC_BLT | I915_EXEC_FENCE_OUT;
+
+       gem_execbuf_wr(fd, &execbuf);
+       fence = execbuf.rsvd2 >> 32;
+       igt_assert(fence != -1);
+
+       igt_post_hang_ring(fd, hang); /* wedged, with an unready batch */
+
+       igt_assert_eq(__gem_wait(fd, obj[1].handle, -1), 0);
+       igt_assert_eq(sync_fence_status(fence), -EIO);
+       close(fence);
+
+       igt_require(i915_reset_control(true));
+       trigger_reset(fd);
+}
+
+#define HAVE_EXECLISTS 0x1
+#define HAVE_GUC 0x2
+#define HAVE_SEMAPHORES 0x4
+
+static unsigned print_welcome(int fd)
+{
+       unsigned flags = 0;
+       bool active;
+       int dir;
+
+       dir = igt_sysfs_open_parameters(fd);
+       if (dir < 0)
+               return 0;
+
+       active = igt_sysfs_get_boolean(dir, "enable_guc_submission");
+       if (active) {
+               igt_info("Using GuC submission\n");
+               flags |= HAVE_GUC | HAVE_EXECLISTS;
+               goto out;
+       }
+
+       active = igt_sysfs_get_boolean(dir, "enable_execlists");
+       if (active) {
+               igt_info("Using Execlists submission\n");
+               flags |= HAVE_EXECLISTS;
+               goto out;
+       }
+
+       active = igt_sysfs_get_boolean(dir, "semaphores");
+       if (active)
+               flags |= HAVE_SEMAPHORES;
+       igt_info("Using Legacy submission%s\n",
+                active ? ", with semaphores" : "");
+
+out:
+       close(dir);
+       return flags;
+}
+
 igt_main
 {
+       unsigned int caps = 0;
        int fd = -1;
 
        igt_skip_on_simulation();
 
        igt_fixture {
                fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
+               caps = print_welcome(fd);
                igt_require_gem(fd);
                igt_require_hang_ring(fd, I915_EXEC_DEFAULT);
        }
@@ -227,6 +309,11 @@ igt_main
        igt_subtest("in-flight-external")
                test_inflight_external(fd);
 
+       igt_subtest("in-flight-internal") {
+               igt_require(!(caps & HAVE_SEMAPHORES));
+               test_inflight_internal(fd);
+       }
+
        igt_fixture
                close(fd);
 }
-- 
2.14.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to