On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com> wrote: > Rewriting this code without the goto, I believe, makes it more readable. > One functional change that has been included is the handling of failed ESI > register reads. Instead of disabling MST only for the first failed read, we > now disable MST on subsequent failed reads too. A failed ESI read is > problematic irrespective of whether it is the first or not. > > Cc: James Ausmus <james.aus...@intel.com> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 75 > +++++++++++++++++------------------------ > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > index 98e7b96ca826..cc129aa444ac 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > @@ -4191,57 +4191,44 @@ static void intel_dp_handle_test_request(struct > intel_dp *intel_dp) > static int > intel_dp_check_mst_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > { > - bool bret; > + u8 esi[DP_DPRX_ESI_LEN] = { 0 }; > + struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp); > > - if (intel_dp->is_mst) { > - u8 esi[DP_DPRX_ESI_LEN] = { 0 }; > - int ret = 0; > - int retry; > + if (!intel_dp->is_mst) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + while (intel_dp_get_sink_irq_esi(intel_dp, esi)) {
It looks like if the underlying drm_dp_dpcd_read fails and returns -EIO, for instance, you'll get true back from intel_dp_get_sink_irq_esi, and you'll still go in to the while, but with a potentially invalid esi. Granted, this is a problem in the original code as well, but it seems like something that should be fixed during the refactoring. > + int ret, retry; > bool handled; > - bret = intel_dp_get_sink_irq_esi(intel_dp, esi); > -go_again: > - if (bret == true) { > - > - /* check link status - esi[10] = 0x200c */ > - if (intel_dp->active_mst_links && > - !drm_dp_channel_eq_ok(&esi[10], > intel_dp->lane_count)) { > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("channel EQ not ok, > retraining\n"); > - intel_dp_start_link_train(intel_dp); > - intel_dp_stop_link_train(intel_dp); > - } > > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("got esi %3ph\n", esi); > - ret = drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, esi, > &handled); > - > - if (handled) { > - for (retry = 0; retry < 3; retry++) { > - int wret; > - wret = > drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dp->aux, > - > DP_SINK_COUNT_ESI+1, > - &esi[1], 3); > - if (wret == 3) { > - break; > - } > - } > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("ESI %3ph\n", esi); > > - bret = intel_dp_get_sink_irq_esi(intel_dp, > esi); > - if (bret == true) { > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("got esi2 %3ph\n", esi); > - goto go_again; > - } > - } else > - ret = 0; > + /* check link status - esi[10] = 0x200c */ > + if (intel_dp->active_mst_links && > + !drm_dp_channel_eq_ok(&esi[10], intel_dp->lane_count)) { > + intel_dp_start_link_train(intel_dp); > + intel_dp_stop_link_train(intel_dp); > + } > > - return ret; > - } else { > - struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = > dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp); > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to get ESI - device may have > failed\n"); > - intel_dp->is_mst = false; > - drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, > intel_dp->is_mst); > - /* send a hotplug event */ > - > drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(intel_dig_port->base.base.dev); > + ret = drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, esi, &handled); You're no longer using the value returned by drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq > + if (!handled) > + return 0; > + > + for (retry = 0; retry < 3; retry++) { > + int wret; > + > + wret = drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dp->aux, > + DP_SINK_COUNT_ESI + 1, > &esi[1], > + 3); > + if (wret == 3) > + break; > } > } > + > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to get ESI - device may have failed\n"); > + intel_dp->is_mst = false; > + drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, intel_dp->is_mst); > + drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(intel_dig_port->base.base.dev); > return -EINVAL; > } > > -- > 2.11.0 > -- James Ausmus _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx