After we see our target seqno has been completed by the hw, we need to
confirm that it still matches the request (as it may have been preempted
before the spin completes). If the request no longer matches the target
seqno, we need to restart the wait to reacquire that seqno.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
index 813a3b546d6e..289fb08acaf5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
@@ -1040,12 +1040,9 @@ bool __i915_spin_request(const struct 
drm_i915_gem_request *req,
        irq = atomic_read(&engine->irq_count);
        timeout_us += local_clock_us(&cpu);
        do {
-               if (seqno != i915_gem_request_global_seqno(req))
-                       break;
-
                if (i915_seqno_passed(intel_engine_get_seqno(req->engine),
                                      seqno))
-                       return true;
+                       return seqno == i915_gem_request_global_seqno(req);
 
                /* Seqno are meant to be ordered *before* the interrupt. If
                 * we see an interrupt without a corresponding seqno advance,
-- 
2.14.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to