Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-09-25 16:15:42) > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> > > We can use engine busy stats instead of the MMIO sampling timer > for better efficiency. > > As minimum this saves period * num_engines / sec mmio reads, > and in a better case, when only engine busy samplers are active, > it enables us to not kick off the sampling timer at all.
Or you could inspect port_isset(execlists.port). You can avoid the mmio for this case also by just using HWSP. It's just that I never enabled busy tracking in isolation, so I always ended up using the mmio. Stronger argument is that this method give more precise timing than stochastic sampling. > > v2: Rebase. > v3: > * Rebase, comments. > * Leave engine busyness controls out of workers. > v4: Checkpatch cleanup. > v5: Added comment to pmu_needs_timer change. > v6: > * Rebase. > * Fix style of some comments. (Chris Wilson) > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> With a better explanation of why this is preferred, Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
