On 10/6/2017 6:10 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Sagar Arun Kamble (2017-10-06 13:13:35)
We were using dev_priv->pm for runtime power management related state.
This patch renames it to "rpm" which looks more apt. Will be using pm
for state containing RPS/RC6 state in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kam...@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Radoslaw Szwichtenberg <radoslaw.szwichtenb...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Thinking about this again, rpm, pm are very close. How about if we used
i915->runtime_pm and i915->gt_pm (or i915->gt.pm)? Imre, any thoughts?
rps.hw_lock/pcu_lock is used by display too, so I just kept it pm.
should we pull rps.hw_lock/pcu_lock out into drm_i915_private
and then gt_pm would be good.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
