Get rid of redundant intel_dp_num_rates(). We can simply look at the
rate and limit based on that.
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.nav...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 26 +++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 09d75df497c0..b0f446b68f42 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -137,32 +137,20 @@ static void vlv_steal_power_sequencer(struct drm_device
*dev,
enum pipe pipe);
static void intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
-static int intel_dp_num_rates(u8 link_bw_code)
-{
- switch (link_bw_code) {
- default:
- WARN(1, "invalid max DP link bw val %x, using 1.62Gbps\n",
- link_bw_code);
- case DP_LINK_BW_1_62:
- return 1;
- case DP_LINK_BW_2_7:
- return 2;
- case DP_LINK_BW_5_4:
- return 3;
- }
-}
-
/* update sink rates from dpcd */
static void intel_dp_set_sink_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
- int i, num_rates;
+ int i, max_rate;
- num_rates = intel_dp_num_rates(intel_dp->dpcd[DP_MAX_LINK_RATE]);
+ max_rate =
drm_dp_bw_code_to_link_rate(intel_dp->dpcd[DP_MAX_LINK_RATE]);
- for (i = 0; i < num_rates; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(default_rates); i++) {
+ if (default_rates[i] > max_rate)
+ break;
intel_dp->sink_rates[i] = default_rates[i];
+ }
- intel_dp->num_sink_rates = num_rates;
+ intel_dp->num_sink_rates = i;
}
/* Theoretical max between source and sink */
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
