On 10/18/2017 6:42 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 18/10/2017 07:46, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
GuC log runtime/relay channel data is released during i915 unregister,
So only GuC log vma needs to be released during submission_fini.
Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kam...@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospu...@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
index a2e8114..c360b37 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
@@ -1021,7 +1021,7 @@ void i915_guc_submission_fini(struct
drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
ida_destroy(&guc->stage_ids);
guc_ads_destroy(guc);
- intel_guc_log_destroy(guc);
+ i915_vma_unpin_and_release(&guc->log.vma);
i915_gem_object_unpin_map(guc->stage_desc_pool->obj);
i915_vma_unpin_and_release(&guc->stage_desc_pool);
}
Doesn't it make more sense to hide the logging implementation details
from this call site?
Yes right. Will need to separate logging from submission cleanup here.
And I can't find the remaining caller of the intel_guc_log_destroy in
the current codebase? Unless it was added in one of the previous patches?
It is called during submission_init on failure and that too will need to
be changed as we separate logging from submission.
Thanks
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
