Quoting Michał Winiarski (2017-10-19 19:36:17) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > index ef14c6d570dc..7d52baf4f3bd 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > @@ -2904,6 +2904,16 @@ i915_gem_reset_prepare_engine(struct intel_engine_cs > *engine) > tasklet_kill(&engine->execlists.irq_tasklet); > tasklet_disable(&engine->execlists.irq_tasklet); > > + /* > + * We're using worker to queue preemption requests from the tasklet in > + * GuC submission mode. > + * Even though tasklet was disabled, we may still have a worker > queued. > + * Let's make sure that all workers scheduled before disabling the > + * tasklet are completed before continuing with the reset. > + */ > + if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission)
Don't we have engine->i915->guc.preempt_ctx or something a bit more specific than a modparam? > + flush_workqueue(engine->i915->guc.preempt_wq); Ok, after some thought, this is the preferred order. If we do the flush early, we may end up a worker queued before we kill the tasklet. Too late and tasklet_action spins a little; that's better than parallel writes into the hw. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
