On Thu,  6 Sep 2012 22:08:33 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> wrote:

> Because they should have been disabled when shutting down the display
> pipe previously. To ensure that this is the case, add a few assserts
> instead of unconditionally disabling the fdi link.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 6c06109..0973797 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -3182,10 +3182,12 @@ static void ironlake_crtc_enable(struct drm_crtc 
> *crtc)
>  
>       is_pch_port = intel_crtc_driving_pch(crtc);
>  
> -     if (is_pch_port)
> +     if (is_pch_port) {
>               ironlake_fdi_pll_enable(intel_crtc);
> -     else
> -             ironlake_fdi_disable(crtc);
> +     } else {
> +             assert_fdi_tx_disabled(dev_priv, pipe);
> +             assert_fdi_rx_disabled(dev_priv, pipe);
> +     }
>  
>       /* Enable panel fitting for LVDS */
>       if (dev_priv->pch_pf_size &&

Yep.

Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org>

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to