On 10/25/2017 08:56 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 19:21:23 +0200, Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundare...@intel.com> wrote:

Updating GuC and HuC firmware select function to support removing
i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading module parameter.

Hmm, is it correct order of patches ? this modparam was already removed in 2/6

I will move this to be the third patch. Since the change to uc.c was separated from 2/6,
I had included that as 3/6.


v2: Clarifying the commit message (Anusha)

v3: Unify seq_puts messages, Re-factoring code as per review (Michal)

v4: Rebase

v5: Separating message unification into a separate patch

v6: Re-factoring code (Sagar, Michal)
    Rebase

v7: Separating from previuos patch (Sagar)
    Rebase

v8: Including change to intel_uc.c
    Applying review comments (Michal)

Signed-off-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundare...@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.sriva...@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.ma...@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kam...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.c | 10 +++-------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.h |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c    |  3 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c     |  6 ++++++
 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.c
index ef67a36..b9f834f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.c
@@ -60,10 +60,8 @@
  * intel_guc_fw_select() - selects GuC firmware for uploading
  *
  * @guc:    intel_guc struct
- *
- * Return: zero when we know firmware, non-zero in other case
  */
-int intel_guc_fw_select(struct intel_guc *guc)
+void intel_guc_fw_select(struct intel_guc *guc)
 {
     struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
@@ -90,11 +88,9 @@ int intel_guc_fw_select(struct intel_guc *guc)
         guc->fw.major_ver_wanted = GLK_FW_MAJOR;
         guc->fw.minor_ver_wanted = GLK_FW_MINOR;
     } else {
-        DRM_ERROR("No GuC firmware known for platform with GuC!\n");
-        return -ENOENT;
+        DRM_ERROR("No GuC FW known for platform with GuC!\n");
+        return;
     }
-
-    return 0;
 }
/*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.h
index 023f5ba..7f6ccaf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.h
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
struct intel_guc;
-int intel_guc_fw_select(struct intel_guc *guc);
+void intel_guc_fw_select(struct intel_guc *guc);
 int intel_guc_fw_upload(struct intel_guc *guc);
#endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c
index c8a48cb..4e700ab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c
@@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ void intel_huc_select_fw(struct intel_huc *huc)
         huc->fw.major_ver_wanted = GLK_HUC_FW_MAJOR;
         huc->fw.minor_ver_wanted = GLK_HUC_FW_MINOR;
     } else {
-        DRM_ERROR("No HuC firmware known for platform with HuC!\n");
+        if (HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
+            DRM_ERROR("No HuC FW known for platform with HuC!\n");
         return;
     }
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
index 9369ade..dc978a0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
@@ -82,11 +82,17 @@ void intel_uc_sanitize_options(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
void intel_uc_init_early(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
+    struct intel_guc *guc = &dev_priv->guc;
+    struct intel_huc *huc = &dev_priv->huc;

Please run checkpatch and add separation line here

Will do.

intel_guc_init_early(&dev_priv->guc);

You can now pass 'guc' as param

Will do.

+    intel_guc_fw_select(guc);
+    intel_huc_select_fw(huc);

To avoid redundant checks in select_fw() functions we can
exit earlier with

I will add the early exit condition.

Thanks for the review.

    if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
        return;

 }
void intel_uc_init_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
+    if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
+        return;
     intel_uc_fw_fetch(dev_priv, &dev_priv->huc.fw);
     intel_uc_fw_fetch(dev_priv, &dev_priv->guc.fw);
 }

Regards,
Sujaritha
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to