If we can not run the drunk_hole test because we couldn't allocate the
memory for the permutation array (even after we tried trimming the
size), report a clear ENOMEM. Similary, if we are asked to operate on a
hole too small for ourselves, make it skip quietly.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.a...@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
index 3dcf886a2802..d0ce496606ed 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
@@ -705,12 +705,18 @@ static int drunk_hole(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
if (hole_size > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE / sizeof(u32))
hole_size = KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE / sizeof(u32);
count = hole_size;
+ if (!count) {
+ pr_debug("%s: hole is too small [%llx - %llx] >> %d:
%d\n",
+ __func__, hole_start, hole_end, size, count);
+ break;
+ }
+
do {
count >>= 1;
order = i915_random_order(count, &prng);
} while (!order && count);
if (!order)
- break;
+ return -ENOMEM;
/* Ignore allocation failures (i.e. don't report them as
* a test failure) as we are purposefully allocating very
--
2.15.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
