On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 04:08:28PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 11:59:45AM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 09:05:02PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Hi Ville,
> >
> > >
> > > Move the plane clip rectangle handling into
> > > drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_state(). Drivers no longer
> > > have to worry about such mundane details.
> >
> > This is quite an important patch and I dare say the essence of your
> > series, right? Yet very few people got Cc-ed on it (1 AFAICT) and it
> > touches quite a few drivers.
>
> It has no functional changes, so forgetting to plaster it with Ccs
> doesn't seem all that dangerous. All the (potentially) functional
> changes were in the prep patches which had Ccs, as did the cover
> letter. And maintainers should read the ml anyway ;)
Maintainers don't maintain the functionality, they maintain the source
code. They fix conflicts and order patches. On that line, not Cc-ing
maintainers when you change the code of the drivers they maintain makes
their lives all more ... "entertaining".
And I would argue that the patch does introduce functional changes, as
it removes the clip rectangle from drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_state()'s
list of parameters. It does change all the users of it, too, I agree, but
not for people that have drivers not yet upstreamed (and they start to wonder
how one driver compiles and other fails when they were supposed to have the
same code inside :) )
Regards,
Liviu
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
