In i915_pages_create_for_stolen it probably makes more sense to check if
the range overflows the stolen_usable_size, since the size of dsm will also
include the reserved portion which we can't touch.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.a...@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
index 2267af68c3e1..f8c9f0446712 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ i915_pages_create_for_stolen(struct drm_device *dev,
struct sg_table *st;
struct scatterlist *sg;
- GEM_BUG_ON(range_overflows(offset, size,
resource_size(&dev_priv->dsm)));
+ GEM_BUG_ON(range_overflows(offset, size, dev_priv->stolen_usable_size));
/* We hide that we have no struct page backing our stolen object
* by wrapping the contiguous physical allocation with a fake
--
2.14.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
