On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 10:47 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.u > k> wrote: > > Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-12-05 18:00:00) > > > When we see an e1000e HW lockup in CI, it is typically fatal with > > > the > > > hang repeating until the host is forcibly rebooted. Speed up that > > > process by tainting the kernel, which CI can trivially detect > > > (and is > > > being used to detect similarly fatal CI conditions) and reboot > > > soon > > > after. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> > > > Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarv...@intel.com> > > > > I'm not concerned on selling this to e1000e, but if it helps > > improving > > CI robustness, then topic/core-for-CI. Or maybe we should create a > > new > > topic, Daniel? topic/taints-for-CI? > > Sounds like a usable idea for CI. Would be especially interesting > because despite applying the suggested w/a, we still hit lockups. > Before we do that though I think we should get an ack from the e1000e > team. Jani S. maybe something you can driver? > > Adding more folks to cc. > -Daniel
Please send any e1000e patches to the intel-wired-lan mailing list and make sure to CC Sasha Neftin <sasha.nef...@intel.com>, since he is the e1000e driver maintainer.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
