Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2017-12-08 16:27:17)
> The test expected IOCTL 'I915_GET_RESET_STATS' would return an error
> when not root. That is no longer true in the driver and therefore
> the test was incorrectly failing.
>
> Cc: Michel Thierry <[email protected]>
> Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Antonio Argenziano <[email protected]>
> ---
> tests/gem_reset_stats.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/gem_reset_stats.c b/tests/gem_reset_stats.c
> index edc40767..83c91f0f 100644
> --- a/tests/gem_reset_stats.c
> +++ b/tests/gem_reset_stats.c
> @@ -605,10 +605,7 @@ static void test_reset_count(const struct
> intel_execution_engine *e,
>
> c2 = get_reset_count(fd, ctx);
>
> - if (ctx == 0)
> - igt_assert(c2 == -EPERM);
> - else
> - igt_assert(c2 == 0);
> + igt_assert(c2 == 0);
> }
>
> igt_waitchildren();
> @@ -619,6 +616,11 @@ static void test_reset_count(const struct
> intel_execution_engine *e,
> close(fd);
> }
>
> +static int __get_reset_stats(int fd, struct local_drm_i915_reset_stats *rs)
> +{
> + return drmIoctl(fd, GET_RESET_STATS_IOCTL, &rs);
> +}
> +
> static int _test_params(int fd, int ctx, uint32_t flags, uint32_t pad)
> {
> struct local_drm_i915_reset_stats rs;
> @@ -644,10 +646,16 @@ static void _check_param_ctx(const int fd, const int
> ctx, const cap_t cap)
> const uint32_t bad = rand() + 1;
>
> if (ctx == 0) {
> - if (cap == root)
> igt_assert_eq(_test_params(fd, ctx, 0, 0), 0);
Spurious indenting leftover.
> - else
> - igt_assert_eq(_test_params(fd, ctx, 0, 0), -EPERM);
> + if (cap != root) {
So what are you expecting to happen if you do happen to be rot? Is this
test redundant, which is why you skipped it?
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
