On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 03:49:16AM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 18:09 -0600, Rob Clark wrote:
> >
> > /* Called before vblank count and timestamps have
> > * been updated for the vblank interval of flip
> > * completion? Need to increment vblank count and
> > * add one videorefresh duration to returned timestamp
> > * to account for this. We assume this happened if we
> > * get called over 0.9 frame durations after the last
> > * timestamped vblank.
> > *
> > * This calculation can not be used with vrefresh rates
> > * below 5Hz (10Hz to be on the safe side) without
> > * promoting to 64 integers.
> > */
> > if (10 * (timeval_to_ns(&tnow) - timeval_to_ns(&tvbl)) >
> > 9 * crtc->framedur_ns) {
> > event->event.sequence++;
> > tvbl = ns_to_timeval(timeval_to_ns(&tvbl) +
> > crtc->framedur_ns);
> > }
>
> This has been recently removed by danvet's "drm/i915: don't frob the
> vblank ts in finish_page_flip", though not yet committed, so we can do
> away with it here too.
Yeah, I'd prefer if the common code doesn't have such hackes - this bit
here papered over some bugs in our driver code, but only partially
successfully ...
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
