Quoting Jani Nikula (2017-12-18 17:37:13) > On Mon, 18 Dec 2017, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > > Looks good, I'm thinking we might push the drm_printer to the caller of > > intel_device_info_dump(), but this is already a substantial improvement > > Param ordering seems a bit surprising in both patches. Target first?
The param order at the moment tries to be (object-doing-the-dump, stream-as-parameter). I don't think it is quite so backwards as it first appears, when compared to printf(stderr, fmt,...) or even seq_printf(m, fmt, ..). In both of those printf cases, it is the stream that can be argued is providing the object (even more so if you create your own stream using cookie_io_functions_t). But for us, it is clearer to argue that the object we control is the object providing the method to output into the stream. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
