Em Qua, 2018-01-10 às 11:39 +0200, Joonas Lahtinen escreveu:
> On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 21:23 -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > For now it does nothing, except for avoiding a MISSING_CASE.
> >
> > v2: Rebase.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
>
> <SNIP>
>
> > +static void icl_init_clock_gating(struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv)
> > +{
> > +
> > +}
>
> Is this intentionally empty? If we don't foresee need for this in
> future, we could factor it out at higher level.
It's not in this series, but there exist patches that add code to it.
To be sent soon.
Having the empty function here will make conflicts a little easier to
handle later.
>
> Regards, Joonas
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
