On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 11:28:19PM +0000, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
>
> The current size may be bigger than the correct one, this needs to be
> revisited later.
I don't believe this is true anymore. When this was written initially CNL had a
higher value.
Higher values are ok, but smaller can be problematic if I understood correctly.
So we might need to check the accurate number.
Oscar has a good method for that if iirc ;)
>
> v2: Rebase.
>
> Acked-by: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widaw...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> index e88b2fd44724..a373bcbd85d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> @@ -181,6 +181,8 @@ __intel_engine_context_size(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv, u8 class)
> switch (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv)) {
> default:
> MISSING_CASE(INTEL_GEN(dev_priv));
> + case 11:
> + /* TODO: Make sure this is correct. */
> case 10:
> return GEN10_LR_CONTEXT_RENDER_SIZE;
> case 9:
> --
> 2.14.3
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
