On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 15:26 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> It is a fact that scheduled work is now improved.
>
> But it is also a fact that on core platforms that shouldn't
> be needed. We only need to actually wait on VLV/CHV.
>
> The immediate enabling is actually not an issue for the
> HW perspective for core platforms that have HW tracking.
> HW will wait few identical idle frames before transitioning
> to actual psr active anyways.
>
> Note that this patch also remove the delayed activation
> on HSW and BDW introduced by commit 'd0ac896a477d
> ("drm/i915: Delay first PSR activation.")'. This was
> introduced to fix a blank screen on VLV/CHV and also
> masked some frozen screens on other core platforms.
> Probably the same that we are now properly hunting and fixing.
>
> Furthermore, if we stop using delayed activation on core
> platforms we will be able, on following up patches,
> to use available workarounds to make HW tracking properly
> exit PSR instead of the big nuke of disabling psr and
> re-enable on exit and activate respectively.
> At least on few reliable cases.
>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 14 +++++++-------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index da80ee16a3cf..541290c307c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -2522,18 +2522,18 @@ static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct seq_file *m,
> void *data)
> seq_printf(m, "Busy frontbuffer bits: 0x%03x\n",
> dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits);
>
> - if (timer_pending(&dev_priv->psr.activate_timer))
> - seq_printf(m, "Activate scheduled: yes, in %dms\n",
> -
> jiffies_to_msecs(dev_priv->psr.activate_timer.expires - jiffies));
> - else
> - seq_printf(m, "Activate scheduled: no\n");
> -
> - if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) {
> + if (!IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) && !IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
I don't get this change, it is better to retain HAS_DDI().
> if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support)
> enabled = I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_CTL) & EDP_PSR2_ENABLE;
> else
> enabled = I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & EDP_PSR_ENABLE;
> } else {
> + if (timer_pending(&dev_priv->psr.activate_timer))
> + seq_printf(m, "Activate scheduled: yes, in %dms\n",
> +
> jiffies_to_msecs(dev_priv->psr.activate_timer.expires - jiffies));
> + else
> + seq_printf(m, "Activate scheduled: no\n");
> +
> for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
> enum transcoder cpu_transcoder =
> intel_pipe_to_cpu_transcoder(dev_priv, pipe);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index 826b480841ac..13409c6301e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -455,6 +455,8 @@ static void intel_psr_schedule(struct drm_i915_private
> *i915,
> {
> unsigned long next;
>
> + WARN_ON(!IS_VALLEYVIEW(i915) && !IS_CHERRYVIEW(i915));
> +
How about using only !(IS_VLV() || IS_CHV) in this file.
I think this is a reasonable check to have, please add a return too.
WARN_ON(!(IS_VLV() || IS_CHV())
return;
> lockdep_assert_held(&i915->psr.lock);
>
> /*
> @@ -543,7 +545,7 @@ void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> dev_priv->psr.enable_source(intel_dp, crtc_state);
> dev_priv->psr.enabled = intel_dp;
>
> - if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9) {
> + if (!IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) && !IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
How about inverting this?
if (IS_VLV() || IS_CHV())
intel_psr_schedule()
else
intel_psr_activate()
is easier to follow IMO.
What is the reason to not use HAS_DDI() ?
> intel_psr_activate(intel_dp);
> } else {
> /*
> @@ -553,8 +555,6 @@ void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> * However on some platforms we face issues when first
> * activation follows a modeset so quickly.
> * - On VLV/CHV we get bank screen on first activation
> - * - On HSW/BDW we get a recoverable frozen screen until
> - * next exit-activate sequence.
> */
> intel_psr_schedule(dev_priv,
> intel_dp->panel_power_cycle_delay * 5);
> @@ -687,6 +687,8 @@ static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work)
> struct drm_crtc *crtc = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base.crtc;
> enum pipe pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;
>
> + WARN_ON(!IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) && !IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv));
> +
This is not needed, we don't even setup the work function for VLV/CHV.
Since the functions are all contained in this one file, I don't see much
risk of somehow ending up here.
> /* We have to make sure PSR is ready for re-enable
> * otherwise it keeps disabled until next full enable/disable cycle.
> * PSR might take some time to get fully disabled
> @@ -757,6 +759,8 @@ static void intel_psr_timer_fn(struct timer_list *timer)
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 =
> from_timer(i915, timer, psr.activate_timer);
>
> + WARN_ON(!IS_VALLEYVIEW(i915) && !IS_CHERRYVIEW(i915));
> +
This is not needed too.
> /*
> * We need a non-atomic context to activate PSR. Using
> * delayed_work wouldn't be an improvement -- delayed_work is
> @@ -945,9 +949,12 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> if (frontbuffer_bits)
> intel_psr_exit(dev_priv);
>
> - if (!dev_priv->psr.active && !dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits)
> - intel_psr_schedule(dev_priv, 100);
> -
> + if (!dev_priv->psr.active && !dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits) {
> + if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
> + intel_psr_schedule(dev_priv, 100);
> + else
> + intel_psr_activate(dev_priv->psr.enabled);
> + }
> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> }
>
> @@ -994,8 +1001,12 @@ void intel_psr_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> dev_priv->psr.link_standby = false;
> }
>
> - timer_setup(&dev_priv->psr.activate_timer, intel_psr_timer_fn, 0);
> - INIT_WORK(&dev_priv->psr.activate_work, intel_psr_work);
> + if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
> + timer_setup(&dev_priv->psr.activate_timer,
> + intel_psr_timer_fn, 0);
> + INIT_WORK(&dev_priv->psr.activate_work, intel_psr_work);
> + }
> +
> mutex_init(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
>
> if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
